My professional editor called The Stygian Blades my best dialogue work across six novels and praised its personality. He identified specific scaffolding needs—sociopolitical context, scene motivations, plot setup—and told me explicitly NOT to rewrite the book. Then I fed the same manuscript to two AI systems to test them. Grok called it pulp and suggested I self-publish “if polished.” Claude identified my comp authors correctly, engaged at what felt like a professional level, then invented problems that would require substantial rewriting while missing every actual issue my editor found. Pattern-matching that sounds sophisticated is more dangerous than obviously bad advice because you might actually follow it. Yet people are already relying on AIs and rewriting books based on algorithmic feedback that fundamentally misreads their work.