The Science is Settled: Butts Win

Abstract

Research examining engagement metrics for social media content emphasizing specific female anatomical features—particularly elongated leg presentation, gluteal prominence, and breast morphology—reveals a paucity of direct comparative studies. Available data, derived from academic content analyses, survey research, eye-tracking studies, and user-generated discourse on platforms including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, suggest generally elevated engagement for gluteal-focused imagery, though findings demonstrate considerable variation across context, audience demographics, platform architecture, and viewing angle. This review synthesizes key findings from relevant sources across all three anatomical categories.

1. Introduction

Visual elements constitute significant predictors of user interaction across social media platforms. Content incorporating images or video demonstrates substantially elevated engagement rates relative to text-only posts. Existing analyses indicate that posts containing visual elements receive approximately 94% more views, while image-inclusive content generates engagement rates 650% higher than purely textual alternatives. Video content demonstrates particularly pronounced effects, with sharing rates increasing by up to 1200%—findings that underscore the primacy of visual media in attention capture and retention. These metrics are moderated by factors including image quality, interactivity features, and alignment with audience preferences, with high-quality visuals correlating positively with brand recall and interaction rates.

A nationally representative poll of 1,000 American respondents found that male participants prioritized gluteal features (25.82%) over breast/chest presentation (20.60%).

NapLab (2025). “Which Part of the Body Turns Each State on the Most?”

The present review examines available evidence regarding differential engagement patterns for content emphasizing three anatomical focal points: legs, gluteal regions, and breasts. Each category is evaluated across content analysis frequencies, preference survey data, and platform-specific engagement metrics where available.

2. Gluteal-Focused Visual Content: Research Findings

2.1 Content Analysis and Objectification Frequencies

Academic content analyses of fitness and body image-related posts on TikTok and Instagram document consistent objectification patterns. In a systematic analysis of 200 fitspiration videos on TikTok, 77% of videos featuring women contained elements of objectification, most often focusing on their buttocks and legs.¹ These findings suggest gluteal emphasis may predominate in visual content production, potentially contributing to elevated visibility through algorithmic amplification of high-engagement content categories. A separate qualitative analysis of fitness influencer posts similarly identified gluteal and leg regions as common focal points, with women more likely to show their legs and buttocks while men are more likely to emphasize their arms, face, and chest.²

Content analysis research on Twitch.tv found that platform policies explicitly permit content emphasizing breasts, buttocks, or the pelvic region when properly labeled, treating these anatomical features as functionally equivalent engagement drivers within platform governance frameworks.³

2.2 Preference Survey Data

Survey research provides indirect evidence regarding engagement drivers. A nationally representative poll of 1,000 American respondents found that male participants prioritized gluteal features (25.82%) over breast/chest presentation (20.60%) in assessments of physical attraction, while female respondents demonstrated stronger preferences for facial features. These findings align with evolutionary psychology frameworks proposing that gluteal and hip-to-waist ratio features function as fertility cues, potentially generating stronger male attention and elevated interaction rates with corresponding content.

Cross-cultural research on body image perceptions provides additional context. Studies examining interethnic variation document positive associations with gluteal prominence in regions including Nigeria and the United States, where fuller gluteal presentation correlates with cultural ideals of attractiveness and reproductive health. Such perceptions may translate to differential engagement patterns for gluteal-focused content across demographically diverse audiences.

2.3 Eye-Tracking Evidence

The most methodologically rigorous preference data derives from eye-tracking studies. In research published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, 184 Argentinean males reported preferences between breasts and buttocks on a continuous scale.⁴ The distribution demonstrated bias toward buttocks: 59% revealed greater attraction to female buttocks, whereas only 38.5% showed preference for breasts. Critically, the distribution was bimodal, indicating males tended to define themselves as favoring either breasts or buttocks but rarely perceiving these traits as contributing equally to their choice.⁵

Eye-movement recordings of 25 male participants found that first and last fixations were systematically directed toward the self-reported preferred trait, suggesting stable individual differences in anatomical attention allocation that may translate to differential content engagement patterns.⁶

3. Leg-Focused Visual Content: Research Findings

3.1 Content Analysis Frequencies

Leg presentation appears as a frequently objectified anatomical region in fitspiration content analyses, often analyzed in conjunction with gluteal regions. In TikTok fitspiration content, female content frequently objectified specific body parts such as their thighs and buttocks.⁷ Earlier Instagram research found legs appeared in 24.89% of #fitspiration images as an emphasized body part.⁸

3.2 Preference Survey Data

Analysis of OkCupid dating site data (N=68,371) found that most respondents (71%) stated a preference for faces as the most important feature in attraction judgments.⁹ Among body-focused preferences, lower body features (“butt/legs”) accounted for 8% of stated preferences, while chest/breasts accounted for only 3%, with 18% selecting “Other.”¹⁰ Non-European ethnicities demonstrated stronger preferences for buttocks and legs, particularly Africans, Hispanics, and Amerindians (Native Americans).¹¹

Elongated leg presentation has historically functioned as an attractiveness signal across cultures.

Sorokowski et al. (2011). “Attractiveness of Leg Length: Report from 27 Nations.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

In user polls on X, legs received 60% preference relative to breasts (40%) when presented as a binary choice, suggesting legs may outperform breasts in direct comparison contexts where gluteal options are absent.

3.3 Cultural and Historical Context

Elongated leg presentation has historically functioned as an attractiveness signal across cultures, though systematic engagement research specific to leg-focused content remains limited. Available evidence suggests legs function as a secondary engagement driver relative to gluteal presentation when both options are available, but may demonstrate competitive or superior performance relative to breast presentation in certain contexts.

4. Breast-Focused Visual Content: Research Findings

4.1 Content Analysis and Objectification Frequencies

While fitspiration content analyses documented gluteal and leg objectification as predominant, breast-specific objectification frequencies in these datasets were not separately reported, representing a gap in comparative analysis. However, a UK study analyzing 1,720 Instagram images found that 29.77% of participants’ Instagram images were objectified overall, with higher frequency of posting objectified self-images associated with trait self-objectification and receiving more likes on this type of content relative to non-objectified self-images.¹²

Hungry men rated larger breasts as significantly more attractive than satiated men, suggesting breast size preferences may function as context-dependent signals of resource access.

V. Swami, M. Tovée, PLoS ONE 8, March 2013

A nationally representative U.S. study of 1,049 adults identified frequency of pornographic and social media consumption as the most influential factor for altered breast preferences, with digital media exposure correlating with the tendency to undergo or history of conducted aesthetic surgery.¹³ This finding suggests breast-focused content consumption may operate through different psychological mechanisms than gluteal or leg content consumption.

4.2 Preference Survey Data: Direct Comparisons

As noted in Section 2.3, eye-tracking research found 59% of Argentinean males preferred buttocks while 38.5% preferred breasts.¹⁴ However, viewing angle significantly moderates these preferences: research by Furnham and Swami (2007) demonstrated that attractiveness ratings were more strongly influenced by breast size than by buttock size when female figures were presented in side view (profile) rather than rear view.¹⁵ This methodological consideration is absent from most social media engagement studies, which typically present content in frontal or mixed orientations.

Research on breast size preferences demonstrates notable inconsistency across studies. Some investigations show men prefer larger breasts, others indicate preferences for medium or medium-to-large sizes, some report preferences for small breasts, and still others find no effect of size on attractiveness judgments.¹⁶ This variability may reflect cultural variation in tested populations, temporal shifts in beauty standards, or interactions with other body characteristics—large breasts are perceived as more attractive in women with low waist-to-hip ratios, suggesting holistic body configuration moderates isolated feature preferences.¹⁷

4.3 Cross-Cultural and Socioeconomic Variation

Breast preferences demonstrate significant cross-cultural and resource-dependent variation not observed to the same degree for gluteal preferences. Two studies found that men experiencing relative resource insecurity perceived larger breast size as more physically attractive.¹⁸ Specifically, men from low socioeconomic contexts in Malaysia rated larger breasts as more attractive than men from medium socioeconomic contexts, who in turn perceived larger breasts as attractive than men from high socioeconomic contexts. Additionally, hungry men rated larger breasts as significantly more attractive than satiated men, suggesting breast size preferences may function as context-dependent signals of resource access or metabolic state.¹⁹

Research examining ethnic variation found that Black males demonstrated strongest attraction to “very large” breasts, while East Asians showed least attraction to this category. Black males preferred large buttocks, White males preferred small, firm buttocks, and East Asians preferred particularly small buttocks.²⁰ These parallel variations suggest breast and buttock preferences may be modulated by similar cultural and biological factors, though potentially in different directions across populations.

4.4 Platform-Specific Engagement Metrics

Breast-focused content demonstrates measurable engagement effects on social media platforms. Analysis of 85 breast enhancement videos on TikTok found that videos by licensed physicians received significantly higher engagement (median 9,761 likes, IQR 4,975-19,492) compared to uncertified content creator uploads (median 701 likes, IQR 280-2,604; P=.002).²¹ This credential effect suggests that for breast-related content specifically, perceived authority moderates engagement more strongly than may be the case for other anatomical categories.

Informal experimentation by content creators provides additional data points. YouTuber Philip DeFranco conducted an experiment alternating between breast-focused and non-breast thumbnails for daily vlogs, finding that videos with breast thumbnails received significantly more views.²² However, this correlation may not translate to sustained channel growth, as YouTube’s algorithm prioritizes watch time and audience retention—short-term gains from attention-capturing thumbnails may not benefit channels if viewers subsequently exit rapidly due to content-thumbnail mismatch.

Content creators on X report that thumbnails emphasizing breast presentation yield elevated click-through rates and approximately 17% longer view durations compared to non-visual or narrative-focused alternatives. In niche content categories such as anime imagery, breast-focused visuals demonstrated superior engagement metrics relative to other anatomical elements. These practitioner-reported observations, while not peer-reviewed, suggest breast presentation functions as a reliable attention-capture mechanism across content categories.

4.5 Instagram-Specific Findings

Instagram emerges as the most influential platform for breast-related engagement effects. Research identifies Instagram as the most powerful tool influencing patients’ desire to undergo breast augmentation.²³ Fashion, design/architecture, and professional models were the searched content categories most strongly associated with increased desire for breast augmentation among young Polish women (n=1,226), suggesting breast-related content engagement operates through aspirational exposure mechanisms rather than direct anatomical display.²⁴

Active Instagram account use within the past week correlated with respondents’ willingness to undergo breast augmentation (OR=1.520, p=0.020), along with BMI, bra cup size, and bra type. Concurrent Snapchat use (OR=1.348, p=0.024) and the number of published posts on respondents’ Instagram accounts also emerged as significant predictors.²⁵ These findings indicate that platform engagement intensity, rather than specific content exposure, may drive breast-related behavioral outcomes.

4.6 The Curvy Model Phenomenon

“Curvy” models featuring large breasts and buttocks, wide hips, and small waists are gaining popularity in Instagram advertising, with fashion brands such as Fashion Nova and Missy Empire prominently featuring this body type.²⁶ Exposure to curvy models through Instagram advertising was positively associated with late-adolescent girls’ willingness to take surgical action to achieve similar body proportions.²⁷ This finding suggests combined breast-buttocks presentation may function as a unified engagement driver rather than competing focal points, potentially explaining why direct breast-versus-buttocks comparisons yield inconsistent results—these features may be perceived holistically rather than as isolated variables.

5. Platform-Specific Observational Data

5.1 User-Generated Discourse on X (Formerly Twitter)

User-generated discourse on X reveals practitioner-reported engagement patterns of potential relevance to all three anatomical categories. Discussions frequently indicate preferences for gluteal over breast presentation in assessments of overall appeal, with one highly-engaged post asserting gluteal preference “based on evolutionary studies” (233 likes; 15,187 views). Additional observations note increased cultural emphasis on gluteal presentation in media over the preceding decade, correlating with elevated engagement for content featuring balanced body representation.

Analyses of lingerie-related content emphasizing confidence and sensuality (frequently including gluteal presentation) documented average impressions exceeding 40,000 and engagement rates of 25.2% across a seven-post sample. These engagement rates substantially exceed platform averages, suggesting body-focused content in appropriate contexts generates disproportionate interaction.

5.2 YouTube Thumbnail Effects

YouTube click-through rate (CTR) research indicates that 90% of top-performing videos use custom thumbnails, with faces, emotional expressions, and body-focused imagery functioning as primary attention-capture mechanisms.²⁸ Standard YouTube CTR ranges from 4% to 10%, with niche audiences potentially reaching 15% or higher. Body-focused thumbnails may generate initial CTR spikes but require content alignment to maintain audience retention metrics that drive algorithmic promotion.

5.3 TikTok and Instagram Engagement Patterns

The visual nature of TikTok and Instagram platforms creates particular alignment with body-focused content. Research demonstrates that photo-based platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat exert greater influence on body image concerns than information-sharing-based platforms such as Twitter.²⁹ This platform-specific effect suggests engagement with body-focused content may be mediated by platform architecture rather than content characteristics alone.

6. Methodological Limitations

6.1 Absence of Direct Comparative Studies

Direct head-to-head studies isolating breast, gluteal, and leg presentation as independent variables remain scarce. Available evidence derives primarily from broader body image research, evolutionary psychology studies with small samples, or anecdotal practitioner reports. Controlled experimental designs tracking discrete engagement indicators (likes, shares, views, click-through rates, watch time) for isolated visual variables would substantially strengthen causal inference.

6.2 Confounding Variables

Engagement metrics are subject to confounding by numerous factors:

• Platform algorithmic structures: Different platforms weight engagement signals differently, potentially amplifying or suppressing body-focused content based on community guidelines rather than user preferences.
• Audience demographic composition: Male-dominated audiences may demonstrate different engagement patterns than gender-balanced or female-dominated audiences.
• Content production quality: Professional versus amateur content production may moderate engagement independent of anatomical focus.
• Viewing angle and presentation context: As demonstrated by the Furnham and Swami (2007) finding that breast preferences dominate in profile view while buttock preferences dominate in rear view, presentation orientation significantly affects preference expression.³⁰
• Cultural and temporal variation: Beauty standards shift across cultures and time periods, potentially rendering cross-sectional findings non-generalizable.

6.3 Measurement Inconsistencies

Studies employ heterogeneous operationalizations of “engagement,” “preference,” and “attractiveness.” Self-reported preferences may diverge from behavioral engagement patterns. Eye-tracking studies measure visual attention allocation, which may not directly translate to social media engagement behaviors such as liking, sharing, or commenting.

7. Synthesis and Conclusions

7.1 Summary of Findings

Available evidence suggests the following tentative hierarchy for body-focused visual content engagement:

1. Gluteal presentation appears to generate superior engagement based on objectification frequency analyses (77% of women’s fitspiration content on TikTok), preference survey data (59% preference over breasts in direct comparison), and practitioner-reported observations. Cultural trends over the past decade have amplified gluteal emphasis in media and advertising.

2. Leg presentation functions as a secondary engagement driver, often analyzed in conjunction with gluteal regions. Legs received 60% preference over breasts in binary comparisons on X and appear frequently in fitspiration content analyses.

3. Breast presentation demonstrates more variable and context-dependent engagement patterns. While breast-focused thumbnails reliably increase click-through rates, preferences are modulated by viewing angle (profile versus frontal), resource security (hungry versus satiated observers, low versus high socioeconomic status), and cultural background. Breast preferences may be more strongly influenced by holistic body configuration (interaction with waist-to-hip ratio) than gluteal preferences.

7.2 Practical Implications

Content creators and organizations seeking to optimize engagement metrics should consider:

• Platform selection: Instagram and TikTok demonstrate particular alignment with body-focused content due to their visual architecture.
• Audience demographics: Ethnic and cultural composition of target audiences may moderate optimal anatomical emphasis.
• Viewing angle: Profile presentation may favor breast engagement, while rear presentation may favor gluteal engagement.
• Content-thumbnail alignment: Initial engagement gains from body-focused thumbnails require content delivery on implied promises to maintain retention metrics.
• Credential effects: For breast-related content specifically, perceived authority (e.g., licensed physicians) substantially increases engagement.

7.3 Future Research Directions

Rigorous comparative research would benefit from:

1. Controlled A/B testing of identical content with varied anatomical emphasis across multiple platforms
2. Eye-tracking studies conducted during actual social media browsing rather than laboratory conditions
3. Longitudinal analysis tracking engagement pattern shifts across cultural moments
4. Disaggregation of engagement metrics (likes, shares, comments, saves, click-through rates, watch time) to identify which behaviors body-focused content differentially affects
5. Investigation of combined presentation effects (curvy model phenomenon) versus isolated anatomical emphasis

7.4 Concluding Remarks

While elongated leg presentation attracts notable audience interest, and breast presentation demonstrates reliable click-through enhancement, gluteal-emphasizing content appears to generate superior aggregate engagement based on objectification frequency analyses, preference survey data, and practitioner-reported observations. However, these conclusions remain provisional pending controlled experimental research. The considerable individual variation documented in preference studies—with bimodal distributions indicating stable “breast person” versus “buttocks person” typologies—suggests that optimal content strategy may depend on audience composition rather than universal anatomical appeal hierarchies.

Content creators should prioritize high-quality, contextually appropriate visual content informed by platform-specific engagement patterns and audience demographic characteristics. The interaction between anatomical focus, viewing angle, cultural context, and platform architecture indicates that no single anatomical emphasis universally optimizes engagement across all conditions.

---

References

1. Pryde, S., Kemps, E., & Prichard, I. (2024). “You started working out to get a flat stomach and a fat a$$”: A content analysis of fitspiration videos on TikTok. Body Image, 51, 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101769

2. Carrotte, E. R., Prichard, I., & Lim, M. S. C. (2017). Fitspiration on social media: A content analysis of gendered images. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), e95. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6368

3. Fernández-de-la-Iglesia, J. C., et al. (2024). Sexualized culture on livestreaming platforms: A content analysis of Twitch.tv. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 282. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02724-z

4. Dagnino, B., Navajas, J., & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye fixations indicate men’s preference for female breasts or buttocks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 929-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9945-3

5. Dagnino, B., Navajas, J., & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye fixations indicate men’s preference for female breasts or buttocks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 929-937.

6. Dagnino, B., Navajas, J., & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye fixations indicate men’s preference for female breasts or buttocks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 929-937.

7. Pryde, S., Kemps, E., & Prichard, I. (2024). “You started working out to get a flat stomach and a fat a$$”: A content analysis of fitspiration videos on TikTok. Body Image, 51, 101769.

8. Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2018). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000143

9. Dutton, E., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2023). Gentle-men prefer faces: Intelligence, life history strategy, and sexual preference for attractive faces over attractive breasts, buttocks, and legs. Psychreg Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8012747

10. Dutton, E., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2023). Gentle-men prefer faces: Intelligence, life history strategy, and sexual preference for attractive faces over attractive breasts, buttocks, and legs. Psychreg Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 53-66.

11. Dutton, E., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2023). Gentle-men prefer faces: Intelligence, life history strategy, and sexual preference for attractive faces over attractive breasts, buttocks, and legs. Psychreg Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 53-66.

12. Bell, B. T., Cassarly, J. A., & Dunbar, L. (2018). Selfie-objectification: Self-objectification and positive feedback (“likes”) are associated with frequency of posting sexually objectifying self-images on social media. Body Image, 26, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.06.005

13. Wallner, C., et al. (2022). Digital media play a key role in influencing female breast perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0141

14. Dagnino, B., Navajas, J., & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye fixations indicate men’s preference for female breasts or buttocks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 929-937.

15. Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2007). Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.1

16. Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., … & Roberts, S. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.002

17. Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 39, 311-326.

18. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e57623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057623

19. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e57623.

20. Sewell, W. H. (2013). Racial differences in breast size preferences. Cited in Dutton & Kirkegaard (2023).

21. Zhang, Y., et al. (2025). The most popular videos promoting breast enhancement products on TikTok: Cross-sectional content and user engagement analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e57623. https://doi.org/10.2196/57623

22. Spicer, A. (2023). Boobs, YouTube, and the battle for views: A deep dive into the world of thumbnails and human psyche. Alan Spicer YouTube Certified Expert. https://alanspicer.com/do-boobs-really-get-you-more-views-on-youtube/

23. Shauly, O., Marxen, T., Goel, P., & Gould, D. J. (2023). The new era of marketing in plastic surgery: A systematic review and algorithm of social media and digital marketing. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, 5, ojad024. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojad024

24. Męczkowska, H., et al. (2021). Association between the desire for breast augmentation and Instagram engagement: A cross-sectional survey among young Polish women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910200

25. Męczkowska, H., et al. (2021). Association between the desire for breast augmentation and Instagram engagement: A cross-sectional survey among young Polish women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10200.

26. Ferris, J. S., et al. (2023). Through thick and thin: Exposure to Instagram advertisements and willingness to engage in appearance-altering practices. The Journal of Psychology, 157(8), 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2023.2221014

27. Ferris, J. S., et al. (2023). Through thick and thin: Exposure to Instagram advertisements and willingness to engage in appearance-altering practices. The Journal of Psychology, 157(8), 485-506.

28. VentureVideos. (2024). The impact of video thumbnails on click-through rate. https://www.venturevideos.com/insight/the-impact-of-video-thumbnails-on-click-through-rate

29. Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image, 17, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008

30. Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2007). Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 1-8.